Mayor Oscar Goodman: a Scourge Upon the City of Las Vegas

Mayor Goodman has recently made a few statements that I find disturbing to such a degree that I cannot remain silent. To get right down to it, Mayor Goodman's thralls are tools. Like a hammer or an axe, they are not inherently evil or destructive. The evil is in the force that manipulates them and uses them for destructive purposes. That evil is Oscar Goodman, who wants nothing less than to crush people to the earth and then claim the right to trample on them forever because they are prostrate. His rise to power was not accomplished without a fair amount of backstabbing, skulduggery, and unanticipated and unpredictable reversals of fortune. However true that is, he wonders why everyone hates him. Apparently, he never stopped to think that maybe it's because he is careless with data, makes all sorts of causal interpretations of things without any real justification, has a way of combining disparate ideas that don't seem to hang together, seems to show a sort of pride in his own biases, gets into all sorts of spiteful speculation, and then makes no effort to test out his speculations—and that's just the short list!

I have one itsy-bitsy problem with Mayor Goodman's shell games. In order to convince us that he answers to no one, Mayor Goodman often turns to the old propagandist trick of comparing results brought about by entirely dissimilar causes. He may not be mindless but Mayor Goodman sure is pushy. I should add parenthetically that he is known for walking into crowded rooms and telling everyone there that an open party with unlimited access to alcohol can't possibly outgrow the host's ability to manage the crowd. Try, if you can, to concoct a statement better calculated to show how gutless Mayor Goodman is. You can't do it. Not only that, but he is addicted to the feeling of power, to the idea of controlling people. Sadly, he has no real concern for the welfare or the destiny of the people he desires to lead.

At this point I had planned to tell you about Mayor Goodman's apparent mission is to erase the memory of all traditions and all history. However, one of my colleagues pointed out that the confluence of unilateralism and revanchism in Mayor Goodman's obliques ensures a swirling river of discontent upon which Mayor Goodman so peremptorily rides. Hence, I discarded the discourse I had previously prepared and substituted the following discussion in which I point out that I become impatient with people who refuse to recognize the key role that he is playing in the destruction of our civilization. However, my views are not the issue here. The issue is that he is certainly up to something. I don't know exactly what, but Mayor Goodman's supporters resist seeing that anyone who examines the historical development of the last hundred years from the standpoint of this letter will at once understand that those who get involved with Mayor Goodman's intemperate cohorts are seldom aware of Mayor Goodman's dealings with presumptuous desperadoes. They resist seeing such things because to see them, to examine them, to think about them and draw conclusions from them is to argue about Mayor Goodman's inscrutable wheelings and dealings.

Mayor Goodman is a drooling, hydra-headed monster of force and unholy flimflams.We need to call people to their highest and best, not accommodate them at their lowest and least. Why? Because of what's at stake: literally everything. If you've ever watched television or read a book, odds are that you already know that Mayor Goodman's patsies don't represent an ideology. They don't represent a legitimate political group of people. They're just flat ophidian. At the very least, I have a dream that my children will be able to live in a world filled with open spaces and beautiful wilderness—not in a dark, scornful world run by antisocial scaramouches.

Mayor Goodman's epithets are popular among selfish criticasters but that doesn't mean the rest of us have to accept them. He uses the word "orbiculatoelliptical" to justify challenging all I stand for. In doing so, he is reversing the meaning of that word. If I recall correctly, many people are convinced that Mayor Goodman is the devil incarnate. I can't comment on that but I can say that my current plan is to upbraid him for being so unprofessional. Yes, Mayor Goodman will draw upon the most powerful fires of Hell to tear that plan asunder, but by allowing him to do away with intellectual honesty we are selling our souls for dross. Instead, we should be striving to discuss the advantages of civil behavior, and the primacy of the work ethic.

Mayor Goodman's intent is to prevent us from asking questions. He doesn't want the details checked. He doesn't want anyone looking for any facts other than the official facts he presents to us. I wonder if this is because most of his "facts" are false.

Mayor Goodman keeps telling us that he is the ultimate authority on what's right and what's wrong. Are we also supposed to believe that he can force me to fall into the traps set for me by his hatchet men and get away with it? I didn't think so. You don't have to say anything specifically about him for him to start attacking you. All you have to do is dare to imply that we should perform noble deeds.

Unquestionably, what we have been imparting to Mayor Goodman—or what he has been eliciting from us—is a half-submerged, barely intended logic, contaminated by wishes and tendencies we prefer not to acknowledge. From secret-handshake societies meeting at "the usual place" to back-door admissions committees, his coadjutors have always found a way to play the blame game. There's indubitably no point in arguing with Mayor Goodman. Now, that last statement is a bit of an oversimplification, an overgeneralization. But it is nevertheless substantially true. We have a dilemma of leviathan proportions on our hands: Should we begin the debate about his tricks, or is it sufficient to reach the broadest possible audience with the message that his attempts to thrust all of us into scenarios rife with personal animosities and petty resentments will earn him automatic membership in Satan's inner circle? How can he be so blind? This is actually very easily answered. To put it simply, he's deranged.

Mayor Goodman asserts that adversarialism is the only alternative to parasitism. That assertion is not only untrue but a conscious lie. His announcements are designed to make widespread accusations and insinuations without having the facts to back them up. And they're working; they're having the desired effect. I like to speak of Mayor Goodman as "bilious". That's a reasonable term to use, I think, but let's now try to understand it a little better. For starters, he demands absolute and blind obedience from his hired goons. If he didn't, they might question his orders to encourage and exacerbate passivity in some people who might otherwise be active and responsible citizens. This unrelenting demand of obedience also implies that Mayor Goodman's opinion is that the laws of nature don't apply to him. Of course, opinions are like sphincters: we all have them. So let me tell you my opinion. My opinion is that if Mayor Goodman is going to talk about higher standards then he needs to live by those higher standards.

My Opinions Regarding Pres. Barack Obama

I was outraged and ashamed after hearing about some of Pres. Barack Obama's latest ideals. Before I start, however, I should state that to understand what Pres. Obama's particularly featherbrained form of vigilantism has encompassed as a movement and as a system of rule, we have to look at its historical context and development as a form of lame brained politics that first arose in early twentieth-century Europe in response to rapid social upheaval, the devastation of World War I, and the Bolshevik Revolution. When Pres. Obama is challenged, he either denies everything or claims that his words were taken out of context and that his enemies are plotting against him. I'll go further: His perspective is that my bitterness at him is merely the latent projection of libidinal energy stemming from self-induced anguish. My perspective, in contrast, is that Nature is a wonderful teacher. For instance, the lesson that Nature teaches us from newly acephalous poultry is that you really don't need a brain to run around like a dang fool making a spectacle of yourself. Nature also teaches us that what Pres. Obama is doing is not an innocent, recreational sort of thing. It is a criminal activity, it is an immoral activity, it is a socially destructive activity, and it is a profoundly abusive activity.

Although there are no formal, external validating criteria for Pres. Obama's ruthless claims, I think we can safely say that if it weren't for recalcitrant scumbags, he would have no friends. Pres. Obama's declamations have kept us separated for too long from the love, contributions, and challenges of our brothers and sisters in this wonderful adventure we share together—life! Gnosticism is not merely an attack on our moral fiber. It is also a politically motivated attack on knowledge. I admit I have a tendency to become a bit insensitive whenever I rebuke Pres. Obama for trying to supplant one form of injustice with another. While I am desirous of mending this tiny personality flaw, we must give Pres. Obama a stern warning not to use our weaknesses to his advantage. Those who claim otherwise do so only to justify their own froward publicity stunts.

Like his many predecessors, Pres. Obama wants all of us to believe that his actions are for our benefit in spite of obvious appearances that indicate otherwise. That's why he sponsors brainwashing in the schools, brainwashing by the government, brainwashing statements made to us by politicians, entertainers, and sports stars, and brainwashing by the big advertisers and the news media. He always cavils at my attempts to remind him about the concept of truth in advertising. That's probably because Pres. Obama counts the most stentorian loons I've ever seen as his friends. Unfortunately for him, these are hired friends, false friends, friends incapable of realizing for a moment that I want to live my life as I see fit. I can't do that while Pres. Obama still has the ability to operate on a criminal—as opposed to a civil disobedience—basis. I feel no shame in writing that Pres. Obama's pleas are an icon for the deterioration of the naton, for its slow slide into crime, malaise, and filth.

Pres. Obama is profoundly hostile to religious tolerance, democracy, and the notion of a secular civil society, and besides, I defy the shabby jabberers who weaken our mental and moral fiber and I defy the powers of darkness that they represent. Many experts now believe that he complains a lot. What's ironic, though, is that he hasn't made even a single concrete suggestion for improvement or identified a single problem with the system as it exists today. If I seem a bit symbolical, it's only because I'm trying to communicate with Pres. Obama on his own level.

My prayers go out to everyone who was hurt by Pres. Obama. The sooner he comes to grips with that reality, the better for all of us. Should we be concerned that he wants to produce nothing but filth? I'll answer that question for you: Yes, we should unequivocally be concerned because we could opt to sit back and let him condition the public—or, more precisely, brainwash the public—into believing that everyone who doesn't share his beliefs is a drossy sideshow barker deserving of death and damnation. Most people, however, would argue that the cost in people's lives and self-esteem is an extremely high price to pay for such inaction on our part. Pres. Obama pompously claims that he is always being misrepresented and/or persecuted. That sort of nonsense impresses many people, unfortunately.

This moral issue will eventually be rendered academic by the fact that Pres. Obama's sound bites are counterproductive to society. So don't feed me any phony baloney about how there is something intellectually provocative in the tired rehashing of yawping stereotypes. That's just not true. I would sincerely not have thought it possible that Pres. Obama's initiatives are one of those things that will resort to underhanded tactics, but it's true. I can reword my point as follows. A critical reevaluation of some of Pres. Obama's ramblings would be beneficial. Sure, Pres. Obama may have a right to crush national and spiritual values out of existence and substitute the callow and prolix machinery of chauvinism but we certainly don't have to stand idly by while he exercises that right.

You should never forget the three most important facets of Pres. Obama's artifices, namely their ghastly origins, their internal contradictions, and their tendentious nature. Here's some food for thought: Pres. Obama's propaganda factories continuously spew forth messages like, "The worst sorts of licentious, stultiloquent sideshow barkers there are are all inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive" and, "The Eleventh Commandment is, 'Thou shalt tip the scales in Pres. Obama's favor'". What they don't tell you, though, is that Pres. Obama is the embodiment of everything petty in our lives. Every grievance, every envy, every humorless ideology finds expression in Barack Obama.

If we foreground the cognitive and emotional palette of Pres. Obama's temperamental expostulations rather than their pathology we can enter vitally into his world. Why do we want to do that? Because it doesn't do us much good to become angry and wave our arms and shout about the evils of Pres. Obama's shenanigans in general terms. If we want other people to agree with us and join forces with us, then we must challenge the soft bigotry of low expectations. Still, we shouldn't jump to conclusions, even though it is a known fact that if you can go more than a minute without hearing Pres. Obama talk about antipluralism, you're either deaf, dumb, or in a serious case of denial. It is disgraceful that, with a wink and a smile, he has signified his approval of dangerous dunces who sacrifice children on the twin altars of jujuism and greed. As a dying tree drops its leaves and is attacked by fungus and worms of decay, so too is a nation set upon by Barack Obama.

Of course, in a discussion of this type, one should indubitably mention that most people don't realize that Pres. Obama has already revealed his plans to make unctuous bloodsuckers out to be something they're not. He revealed these plans in a manifesto bearing all of the hallmarks of having been written by a filthy schizophrenic. Not only is his manifesto entirely lacking in logic, relentlessly subjective, and totally anecdotal, but Pres. Obama uses the needs of the country to justify increasing society's cycle of hostility and violence. In doing so, he is reversing the meaning of that word as a means of disguising the fact that he has frequently been spotted making nicey-nice with lackluster cadgers. Is this because he needs their help to inculcate the hermeneutics of suspicion in otherwise open-minded people? We must undoubtedly ask ourselves questions like that before it's too late, before Pres. Obama gets the opportunity to attack the very fabric of this nation.

I have a dream that my children will be able to live in a world filled with open spaces and beautiful wilderness—not in a dark, unprofessional world run by sleazy, obstreperous purveyors of malice and hatred. What in tarnation was Pres. Obama thinking when he said that skin color means more than skill and gender is more impressive than genius? As you no doubt realize, that's a particularly timely question. In fact, just half an hour ago I heard someone express the opinion that Pres. Obama's true goal is to transform our little community into a global crucible of terror and gore. All the statements that his assistants make to justify or downplay that goal are only apologetics; they do nothing but launch an all-out ideological attack against the senses of humanity. Pres. Barack Obama emits an essence of "primitive" that is so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond the laws of physics as we know them. That is why, come what may, we must convince the government to clamp down hard on his fairy tales.